A glimpse at the charred understory brush and small diameter trees that are the primary culprits of wildfire.  Critics of the McInnis bill wonder if it would address understory removal of simply encourage logging of high-grade, large trees.Finding consensus

Despite these apparent polar opinions, there is one local agency that may be able to strike a true “middle ground”: the San Juan National Forest. Dave Dallison, the forest’s timber project leader, advocates restoration forestry and believes commercial logging can be a component of this kind of wildfire mitigation.

He said there is a project near Dolores where the Forest Service is using commercial logging to thin from below, removing smaller trees with little value, and then applying controlled fire.

“Our intent is to leave the largest trees in a clumpy structure and reduce the density,” he said.

Dallison, a fire-behavior analyst, spent a great deal of time on the ground fighting the Missionary Ridge Fire and says that something has to be done about the state of local forests. However, he notes that any fix will take time.

“I believe we do need to do something, but it took us 100 years to get into this problem,” he says. “It’s not going to be solved in a few years.”

He also adds that commercial logging is just one of the tools the Forest Service taps for forest health. Others include restoration forestry, hydro-mulching, controlled burning and mechanical removal of trees.

“We need to use all the tools we have available to us,” he says. “We’re going to choose the right tool.”

Suitable streamlining

As for the McInnis bill, Dallison would not mind seeing environmental review streamlined. “I know that with timber, about 70 percent of our costs are doing the environmental assessment,” he says. “It would be nice if we could put some of that money toward improvements. I don’t think it would change what we’re doing on the ground, and it would allow us to treat more acres.”

He also notes that involvement of the timber industry can be beneficial in terms of taxpayer costs. However, he also remarks that local logging has seen better days with many loggers being small businesses with limited markets, courtesy of the recent closure of the Olathe Louisiana Pacific plant.

“Really, the timber industry in this area is in bad shape,” he says. “If we lose it, it’s going to cost the public a lot more.”

In closing, Dallison says, “I would not expect a wholesale change in the way we do business. We’re not going to run out there and do a bunch of logging that doesn’t make sense.

Likewise, Pearson said he has confidence in San Juan National Forest officials and credits them for a decade of attention to public needs. “I don’t think this forest will try to ramrod things through with less public input,” he says. “I think they’ve learned that they can be much more successful by building consensus.”

And McInnis bill or no McInnis bill, the local forest will be responsible for its relations with the local populace. As for the Healthy Forests Reform Act, the Senate remained deadlocked over the bill on Wednesday with McInnis wanting bi-partisan agreement on the measure.

“We’d like to achieve bipartisan consensus on this,” Jones says in closing. “We simply want to make NEPA a better system.”

 

 

 

 


News Index Second Index Opinion Index Classifieds Index Contact Index